According to the Supreme Court, accepting a job on compassionate grounds is not a right.

  • Oct. 4, 2022, 12:47 p.m.

Noting that appointment on compassionate grounds is a concession and not a right, the Supreme Court has set aside a Kerala High Court verdict directing the Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd to consider the case of a woman for appointment on compassionate grounds 24 years after the death of her father, who worked for the company.

"Applying the law laid down by this court to the facts of the case on hand..and the object and purpose for which the appointment on compassionate ground is provided, the respondent shall not be entitled to the appointment on compassionate ground on the death of her father, who died in 1995," a bench led by Justice MR Shah said.

"After a period of 24 years from the death of the deceased employee, the respondent shall not be entitled to the appointment on compassionate grounds." If such an appointment is made now and/or after a period of 14–24 years, "the same shall be against the object and purpose for which the appointment on compassionate grounds is provided," it said last week.

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, calling it "unsustainable."

Petitioner Anusree KB’s father—who worked as a loading helper with the Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd.—expired while on duty on April 19, 1995. Since the wife of the deceased employee was working for the state government, she was ineligible for appointment on compassionate grounds.

However, 14 years after her father’s death, Anusree made a representation seeking her appointment on compassionate grounds. Her application was rejected on February 12, 2018 on the grounds that her name was not on the list of dependents submitted by the deceased employee and that the policy was to give employment to the widow, son, or unmarried daughter of the deceased employee.

Author : Rajdhani Delhi Representative

Rajdhani delhi representative

Related News